Detailed reports on each of the Forum meetings are
available to Members only.
Architecture Forum:
The Architecture Forum at Paris hosted a Joint Briefing in collaboration
with the Active Loss Prevention Initiative, which was very well
attended, and provided an update on the role of IT architecture
for reducing the risk, and increasing the securability, reliability,
and adaptability, of implemented IT systems. In their Workshop,
Forum members received a case study from Ian McCall of IBM on the
use of TOGAF in client engagements, and progressed a number of projects
in the 2002 work program, including the migration of TOGAF from
the Technical Architecture space into the Enterprise Architecture
space.
Directory Interoperability Forum:
The DIF members' meeting considered the current state of and future
trends for directory development - in the broadest sense, not just
LDAP. It looked at the role of directories in the Integrated Information
Infrastructure (In3), and discussed ideas for the new-generation
Directory brand. It received reports from standards bodies and the
Secure Messaging Challenge, and reviewed the work of its working
groups. In a joint meeting with the MMF, the DIF planned the completion
of the Mobile and Directory Business Scenario, and considered issueing
a Directory Mobility Challenge.
Enterprise Management Forum:
The Enterprise Management Forum met on Wednesday and focused on
the Pegasus (WBEM/CIM) and XSLM (Software License Use Management)
projects. Pegasus is fast approaching the Release 2.0 code freeze
at the end of April, at which time an intensive debugging and performance
tuning exercise will take place. The XSLM group has been busily
implementing the specification over the last 2 years and will delivering
a revised version in July. The EMF held a joint meeting with the
QoS Task Force and the Real-Time and Embedded Systems Forum looking
at issues of application management. The second half of the week
consisted of a meeting of the Joint Open Group/DMTF Application
Management Working Group, at which significant progress was made
in the development of the CIM Applications Schema.
Mobile Management Forum:
This week’s Mobile Management Forum meeting in Paris saw the largest attendance
since this time last year. After hearing about an enterprise
mobile infrastructure integration case study we re-examined objectives
to energize MMF and in line with the Open Group’s In3 initiative
discussed the MMF as the global integration point for mobility standards.
The MMF will establish liaison with consortia to gain broader industry
acceptance of our work including Session Management. Specifically
we will work with MWIF, TMF and a proposal for DMTF liaison is to
be progressed with a MMF/DMTF mobility working group proposed for
June DMTF meeting in San Jose.
During a meeting of
the joint a joint MMF and Directory Interoperability Forum (MaD)
Working Group we agreed milestones for finalizing the business scenario
and initiated Identity Management discussions.
The meeting voted to initiate an In3 Architecture Project which will define
a Mobile architecture framework using existing Open Group disciplines.
The Taxonomy of Standards produced in 1999 is to be refreshed as
part of this work. The meeting also decided to establish an MMF
Mobile Security Project and we have invited participation from the
Security Forum
Finally we have began to assemble our forward work plan by reviewing work
to date, relating these activities to industry advances in the last
year and scheduled new activities based on recent member survey
feedback. This will lead to structuring projects to focus on the
priorities identified by the membership.
Quality of Service Task Force:
The Quality of Service (QoS) Task Force had their first meeting
with the TeleManagement (TMF) Forum, where they started work on
their new joint initiative for extending the TMF’s Service Level
Agreement (SLA) Handbook. The extension (volume 4) will account
for enterprise and application service level parameters. This project
will map the Enterprise domain parameters to the SLA parameters
already defined within the Telco and Service Provider domain. This
is a very exciting step in moving the QoS Task Force closer to its
vision of enabling end-to-end QoS assurance across all domains.
There was also a joint QoS session with the Enterprise Management
and Real-Time Forums at which issues and standards around managing
and marking applications were explored. These discussions continued
the Task Force’s ongoing investigation into the mapping of application
priority to mission critical processes. There was also a joint session
with the Mobile Management Forum, which offered discussion on customer
and operational QoS requirements as they apply to the mobile environment
and on what the two forums could do together to address them.
Real-time and Embedded Systems Forum:
The Real-time and Embedded Systems Forum continues to gather momentum.
Attendance at this meeting was 108, making this one of the largest,
and certainly the fastest growing group within The Open Group. Sessions
held at Anaheim included the second annual Real-time Linux interest
group covering issues surrounding Real-time Linux. Of major interest
was the presentation on the "Next Generation POSIX Threading
- Moving Linux to The Enterprise". Representatives from OMG,
SAE, DoD RTAG, IEEE POSIX SSWG-RT and INCITS R-1 gave status reports.
The sessions on Safety Critical, Hard Real-time Java, Security for
Limited Resource Environments, POSIX Real-time Profiles and Real-time
Access to Data where an overwhelming success. The Real-time and
Embedded Forum concluded with a Buff on "Open Systems and Military
Applications.
Security Forum:
The Security Forum held a highly productive meeting, not only on
progressing existing work but also on planning new and interesting
activities. Following on the success of the Managers Guide to Information
Security, the Guide to Data Privacy will be published before July,
and a Guide to Working with PKI is also in preparation. The technical
guide on Security Data Patterns is also out for review. Plans are
underway to analyze our best approach to support the In3 strategy,
and to continue our beneficial joint working with other Forums and
external consortia.
|