Home · About · A-Z Index · Search · Contacts · Press · Register · Login

Secure Messaging Certification Briefing

Thursday July 24th 2003

Objective of Meeting

Role of MHDC

Secure Messaging Gateway Certification

Questions

Attendee List

 

 

 

 

1. Introduction

This meeting was arranged in order to brief the vendors of Secure Messaging Gateway projects on the plan for MHDC and The Open Group to work together on the development of a Certification Program for Secure Messaging Gateway products, and to invite vendors to participate in the development of the program.

The immediate next step will be a working meeting in early September 2003, open to members of The Open Group Messaging Forum and MHDC and vendors of messaging products.

The objective of the meeting will be to finalize the specification to be used as the basis for certification.

2. The Role of MHDC

Joe Miller from MHDC explained the role of MHDC and the background to the Secure Messaging Gateway project.

The MHDC CIO forum represents 35 Massachusetts based healthcare organisations. At their meeting earlier on Thursday July 24th, the CIOs committed to a project sponsored by at least 6 of their members that will sponsor a joint project with The Open Group and product vendors to develop and implement interoperable S/MIME gateways. This sponsorship includes funding for a program manager and a commitment to procure certified Secure Messaging Gateway products on successful completion.

 

3. The plan for Secure Messaging Gateway Certification

Mike Lambert from The Open Group presented the plan for the development of the Secure Messaging Gateway Certification program, stressing that MHDC and The Open Group had committed to the program.

3.1 Introduction to The Open Group and Messaging Forum

The presentation started by introducing The Open Group and the Messaging Forum.

  1. The role of activities of The Open Group as a global consortium committed to delivering greater business efficiency by bringing together buyers and suppliers of information technology to lower the time, cost and risk associated with integrating new technology across the enterprise.
    • working with customers to capture, understand and address current and emerging requirements, establish policies and share best practices;
    • working with suppliers, consortia and standards bodies to develop consensus and facilitate interoperability, to evolve and integrate open specifications and open source technologies;
    • offering a comprehensive set of services to enhance the operational efficiency of other consortia; 
    • and developing and operating the industry’s premier certification service and encouraging procurement of certified products.
  2. The reasons why The Open Group is well positioned for this role:
    • Legal Infrastructure registered under the US co-operative research act
    • Cross Industry, bringing customers and suppliers together
    • Vendor and Technology Neutral, no preferred or excluded technologies
    • Global Operation, offices in Europe, US and Japan
    • World Leader in Testing and Conformance
    • Strong Base in Enterprise Integration
  3. The Messaging Forum, evolved from the work of EMA and simply focused on improving the effectiveness of electronic messaging with work in the following areas:

     

    • Secure Messaging. The Open Group Secure Messaging Challenge demonstrated multi-vendor end-to-end secure email. This has been extended to address interoperability issues between different secure mail scenarios, including security at the domain gateway.
    • Coping with Spam. A Managers Guide to coping with Spam is under development.
    • Unified Messaging. Work is going on to better understand the match between customer requirements and current product capabilities.
    • Instant Messaging. Work has just started on identifying the issues associated with Instant Messaging in the enterprise.

3.2 Certification

The next phase of the presentation addressed the need for Certification and ways to develop certification programs.

The underlying objective of certification is very simply:

Broadly available vendor products that fully meet the customer need and interoperate with products from other vendors.
The Open Group operates a certification program under International Trade Mark law.

The Trademark is protected. No-one may use the "Open O" logo unless they have signed an agreement with The Open Group.

The use of the Trademark means that the supplier commits that the product conforms fully to the specification is claims to.

If the Trademark is misused, The Open Group takes legal action and has a track record of success/

The development of a Certification Program potentially involves a number of steps
  1. Understand the customer need. The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) includes a methodology for understanding and documenting customer needs.
  2. Define the appropriate solution in terms of a collection or profile of relevant standards. (The Open Group has a policy of working with other standards bodies).
  3. Define how the Certification program will work (The Certification Policy). This includes the definition of "indicators of compliance" such as the execution of test suites and/or participation in interopreability trials to demonstrate conformance.

At all stages it is necessary to get the buy-in of suppliers and validate the proposed solutions with customers.


There are two approaches that The Open Group offers for certification:

  1. The Open Group develops and operates certification programs as a service for other organizations, against specifications provided. In such cases The Open Group Trademark is not used. Examples of this include programs developed for:
    • Schools Interoperability Forum
    • WAP Forum (Now OMA)
    • Free Standards Group
  2. Consensus programs developed by The Open Group against specifications developed through The Open Group's consensus program. These are developed where there is a broad industry need. Examples include:
    • UNIX
    • LDAP
    • TOGAF

For the Secure Messaging Gateway Certification program, the second approach will be used, because

  • We believe that there is a broad industry need
  • The approach broadens customer buy-in (and increases the value to vendors by avoiding the development of multiple divergent programs by different groups)


The elements of a successful certification program are:

Certification Policy The Certification Policy ties together all of the other elements and defines how the program will operate. 
The Specification  The Specification, referred to as the Product Standard defines precisely what the product must conform to in order to be certified. This is usually a profile of different standards that are integrated to meet the customer need. This integration process may introduce additional specificity, including the selection of options within the underlying standards, but may not "break" the underlying standards.
Trademark License Agreement The Agreement that suppliers must execute before being permitted to use The Open Group trademark.
Trademark Usage Guide Rules of the usage of The Open Group's Trademarks.
Indicators of Compliance Indicators of compliance define how the supplier must demonstrate conformance before being and application for certification can be accepted. This may include
  • Test reports from formal conformance tests
  • Participation in informal testing events
  • Vendor declarations

It is important to note that Certification means a commitment to conformance to the total specification, not simply the elements that are tested. This means that certification has value, even in the absence of formal testing.

Formal. Informal Tests  If the indicators of compliance include any element of testing, then the appropriate conformance tests, environments, test scripts etc. have to be developed and tested to the the level at which they are acceptable as indicators of compliance.
Conformance Statement Questionnaire  The conformance statement questionnaire (CSQ) defines how a specific product conforms to the specification. Wherever there is any alternatives or options in the specification, the CSQ includes a question so that customers can make a judgment about any interoperability issues. Completed CSQs are public documents, allowing different products to be compared.
Certification Application The certification application form is the means by which a supplier requests certification for a product. 
Register of Branded Products The register of branded products is the definitive list of currently certified products, accessible via The Open Group's WEB site.
Customer Procurement  Since the objective of the whole program is the broad availability of product, it is important to ensure that suppliers are motivated to deliver certified product. The most effective way of achieving this is through committed customer procurement programs.
Interpretation Process There will inevitably be times where the specification has been interpreted differently by different parties. In such situations, The Open Group operates an impartial and anonymous interpretation process allows for clarification of the ambiguity without the identity of suppliers of any products involved being disclosed to those making the interpretation.
Renewal All certification programs include annual renewal as a means to ensure ongoing conformance.

 

The items in bold will need to be developed for the SMG Certification Program. The other elements can be taken "off the shelf" as part of The Open Group's Open Brand program.


3.3 SMG Certification - Key Tasks

The key tasks that have to be completed for SMG Certification are:

Agree the Specification

The first step is to build consensus with a working group (this is a joint activity of The Open Group and MHDC)

The specification is subject to the formal Open Group Company Review process to measure consensus (this is one of the key procedures that are necessary for the co-operative research act registration. 

This is a "yes-if" review. Reviewers define specific changes that would make the specification acceptable. Members of The Open Group Messaging Forum will vote on whether to accept the proposed changes.


Define and agree the Conformance Statement Questionnaire 

The CSQ, which defines how optionality within the specification is handled, is developed in the same way as the specification, and is also subject to the Company Review process.

Build customer demand

In this project, the commitment of the MHDC participants will achieve this.

Build vendor buy-in to make products conformant

 

3.4 Next Steps

The immediate next step will be a working meeting in early September 2003, open to members of The Open Group Messaging Forum and MHDC and vendors of messaging products.

The objective of the meeting will be to finalize the specification to be used as the basis for certification.


4. Questions

During the presentation, a number of questions were raised. The following is not exhaustive, but attempts to address the most significant issues.

Q:  What is the status of the IETF DOMsec specification?
A:  The RFC has expired and is waiting for further work
Q:  How does the voting work?
A: During the development work, we will seek "rough consensus" in the working group.
During the formal review, anyone may raise a Change Request, but members of the Messaging Forum vote on acceptance. 75% Yes means acceptance. 75% No means rejection. Anything in between requires further discussion. 75% represents a stable majority, without giving any single company the power of veto.
Q: How do we synchronize with other groups working in the same area?
A: We do not normally attempt to synchronize review cycles with other groups because of different time cycles.

We do have a commitment to respect underlying standards. So if The Open Group profile references a specific version of another organization's document, we work within that organization to "defend" the areas we have adopted. If the other standard changes, our specification will need to be reviewed.

Q: What needs to be tested?
The level of testing will be determined as part of the development of the certification program. The level of testing can change over time.
Minor "service releases" typically don't require retesting. Major new releases of a product will require retesting.
Q: What will this cost?
A: There will be a royalty associated with certification. Fees have not yet been determined but are likely to range between $3000 and $22000 per annum, according to company size. In particular, we want to ensure that small companies are not priced out of the program. There will be a significant discount for members of The Open Group Messaging Forum (in effect, members will be given full credit for their membership to offset the certification fees).
Q: What is the difference between compliance and interoperability?
A: There is a fine line. Compliance to the specification should, if the specifications are totally complete, result in interoperability. In practice this is not always the case. Demonstrated interoperability through PLUGfests are valuable parts of an interoperability certification program.
The Open Group approach to PLUGfests involves closed room "technical" interaction, under non disclosure, with no press and marketing people present. This gives engineers the freedom to admit to and resolve real interoperability problems.
Q: How do the tasks of The Open Group get completed, and who provides the staff to carry out the work?
A: The Open Group is a consortium. The majority of work is carried out by its members, not by staff of The Open Group. We expect representatives of customers to provide resource to define the problem and of suppliers to help develop the technical specifications. The Open Group provides a technical and legal infrastructure and some management and facilitation.
Q: How can we extend involvement beyond MHDC into other industry areas and other regions?
A: This is an important aspect of the program. The best way of achieving this is for participants to introduce us to other potential participants.
  • MHDC can introduce us to similar organizations in other states
  • MHDC members can introduce us to contacts in other industries
  • Messaging system vendors can introduce us to their customers

 

Attendee List

Company Name email Address
American Eagle Group Russ Chung russ.chung@ameagle.com  Yes
John Bogen John Bogen jdb8432@consultant.com  Phone
Brute Squad Labs Blake Ramsdell  blake@brutesquadlabs.com  Phone
BT Global Services Yash Soni yash.soni@concert.com  Yes
BT Syntegra Gary Anderson gary.s.anderson@syntegra.com Yes
Johnson Consulting Dale Johnson dale@jconsult.com  Yes
Ben Littauer Ben Littauer littauer@blkk.com  Yes
MailQube Jonathon Linowes jonathan@parkerhill.com  Yes
Maurizio Balestrieri maurizio.balestrieri@atlanticsky.com  Phone
MHDC Joe Miller jmiller@mahealthdata.org Yes
Mitre Corporation Thoai Nguyen thaoi@mitre.org  Yes
Nexor Graeme Lunt graeme.lunt@nexor.com  Yes
Novell Catherine Waldron cwaldron@novell.com Yes
The Open Group Birgit Hartje b.hartje@opengroup.org  Yes
Mike Lambert m.lambert@opengroup.org  Yes
PostX John Arendes jarendes@postx.com  Phone
Sigaba Steve Danseglio  sdanseglio@sigaba.com  Phone
Tovaris Dean Fleury dfleury@tovaris.com  Yes
Sean Steele ssteele@tovaris.com Yes
Tufts Health Plan Frank Pilleri frank_pilleri@tufts-health.com  Phone
Peg Dreske  peg_dreske@tufts-health.com  Phone
Tumbleweed Ken Beer ken.beer@tumbleweed.com  Yes
Bob Taylor robert.taylor@tumbleweed.com Yes

 

   

Home · Contacts · Legal · Copyright · Members · News
© The Open Group 1995-2009  Updated on Friday, 22 August 2003