Home · About · A-Z Index · Search · Contacts · Press · Register · Login
    

Objective of Meeting
Summary
Outputs
Next Steps
Links


Sponsoring Forum(s):

Quality of Service

Architecture

Enterprise Management


Conference Home Page

Proceedings Index

Meeting Report

Business Scenarios for SLAs

Cannes, France - Tuesday, October 16 2002

Objective of Meeting

This section will say what the meeting set out to achieve. 

Summary

Attendance

Jean Hammond (Forum Chair) JPH Associates jph@jhammond.com
Sally Long (Forum Director) The Open Group s.long@opengroup.org
Neil Davies U4EA Neil.Davies@U4EAGROUP.COM
Charles Richmond IISC cmr@iisc.com
Carl Bunje Boeing carl.f.bunje@boeing.com
Philippe Kipfer Philippe.Kipfer@bluewin.ch
K. Schopmeyer Inova Europe K.Schopmeyer@attglobal.net
Andrew Walker getahead a.walker@getahead.ltd.uk
Jean-Marie Kubek Université Paul Valery, Montpellier jean-marie.kubek@univ-montp3.fr 

 

Jean Hammond, the chair of the QoS Forum, introduced the reasoning behind the use of scenarios.  Her slides are here

Scenarios:

  • Communicate clearly
  • Show detailed relevance to parties from differing domains
  • Support cross domain co-working
  • Allow architectures to be checked against concrete examples

Also, Business Scenarios can be carried out on the same examples to show commercial relevance

The use of the scenarios would be, for example: in co-working with other forums and consortia, such as the Open Group Real-time Forum and the TeleManagement Forum

Jean then described two scenarios which are documented at http://www.opengroup.org/projects/qos_slas/

VOIP Scenario

The first related to VOIP, and described some proposed QoS-based Traffic Handling

Amongst the SLAs that could be considered were

  • Service Availability:
    • Downtime not to exceed 6 min. for preceding 6-month period
  • Call Setup Performance:
    • Dial Response Time not to exceed 3 seconds for any call
    • Call Setup Time not to exceed 3 seconds for any call
  • Call Quality: 
    • MOS not to fall below 3.9 for preceding 6-month period 

Navy Scenario

A second scenario, relating to the Navy, had been received from Deborah Goldsmith of Mitre Corporation.  The system is designed to be on-ship, designed to carry regular applications such as VoIP together with time critical systems.  There is a series of different interconnects between the ships and the rest of the system.  There are some emerging requirements in terms of delay priorities; the scenario brings together traditional command-and-control systems and the traffic requirements of a small city.

Boeing Scenario

Barl Bunje presented a summary of a Boeing Scenario; his slides are here

The scenario is based on an ERP/MRP system within Boeing which has a large number of off-the-shelf applications that have been stitched together, and the resulting overall system is edxtremely complicated.

The reason for looking at SLAs is not just to ensure that response time is adequate, but to ensure that budgets are being allocated in the best way.

There are end-to-end SLAs on transactions through the system, which simply measure response time to the terminal, based on factory requirements; there is an SLA for each transaction, of which there are over 100.  Availability issues are trapped separately and these problems are dealt with differently.

There is extensive instrumentation, which grew at the same time as the application, gathering data to measure compliance.  This data is analysed by commercial tools.

Karl Schopmeyer presented some issues from a presentation he had prepared on Application Manageability.

There was an internal paper, developed within Boeing, which it may be possible to make available to the group.  

Action: Carl will check this.

There was discussion over whether some general principles for SLAs could be developed from this scenario.

Outputs

These notes

Next Steps

A teleconference is planned for 30th October to progress this discussion further

  • Other scenarios 
    • Gather other examples
  • Select scenarios
    • For TMF write up 
    • For a business scenario case 
    • For joint RT challenge

Links

Links to any presentation material etc. If they are included in the text above, just say 'See above'.

Note unless the link is to something outside the Open Group's Web space, all presentation material for this meeting will be held in the same directory as this file, and ALL LINKS SHOULD BE RELATIVE.

 


Home · Contacts · Legal · Copyright · Members · News
© The Open Group 1995-2012  Updated on Wednesday, 23 October 2002