Home · About · A-Z Index · Search · Contacts · Press · Register · Login
    


Objective of Meeting
Summary
Outputs
Next Steps
Links

Sponsoring Forum(s):

Active Loss Prevention

Security


Meeting Report

 

Joint Meeting
Active Loss Prevention Initiative with Security Forum
on
Project ALPINE

Cannes, France - Wednesday October 16 2002

Objective of Meeting

The purpose of this joint meeting was to discuss 3 projects that the ALPI members are working on, and to explain the work involved in the ALPINE project (Active Loss Prevention in IT-eNabled Enterprise).

Summary

Attendees

This meeting was open to all attendees to The Open Group Conference. It included members of the Security Forum, the Active Loss Prevention Initiative, and Partners in the ALPINE project.

Eliot Solomon (Security Forum, SIAC, SIMC)
Steve Jenkins (Security Forum, JPL)
Steve Whitlock (Security Forum, Boeing)
Martin Roe (Security Forum guest, independent consultant, ICX)
Craig Heath (Security Forum, Symbian, Security Forum)
Jeremy Hilton (Viviale, ALPI)
John Mawhood (Tarlo Tyons, ALPI)
Dave Heiman (NASA SEWP, Security Forum)
Dennis Taylor (Security Forum, NASA SEWP)
Scot Hansen (Open Group, EC coordinator)
Richard Sitruk (ETIS, ALPINE Partner)
Mikel Emaldi (ESI)
Estebaliz Delgado (ESI)
Ian Dobson (Security Forum, The Open Group)
David Lounsbury (The Open Group, ALPI)
Chris Taper (Security Forum guest, independent consultant, ICX)
Jane Hill (Viviale, ALPI)
Bob Blakley (IBM/Tivoli, Security Forum)
Ian Lloyd (ALPI, The Open Group)

Discussion

Ian Lloyd showed a spreadsheet listing the Active Loss Prevention initiative activities plan through to 2003. The existing projects are:

  • Risk Vocabulary 1 - 1st draft document due by end 2002
  • Risk Vocabulary 2 - 2nd version of document due in April-Sept 2003 and probably successive maintenance versions to keep it up-to-date.
  • Critical Infrastructure - held meetings recently in USA and Europe on this to help define where the outputs of the initiative will support the needs of critical infrastructure.

A further project under consideration is Actuarial Data - the insurance industry are looking for information assurance information - they need standards on what information they need, how they should gather and maintain it, and how they communicate information. This project could lead to an Insurance Requirements project.

The initiative members intend to progress their projects using short sharp teleconferences at approximately monthly intervals with individuals producing work in between.

Project ALPINE - Active Loss Prevention in It-eNabled Enterprise - was awarded to The Open Group's Active Loss Prevention initiative by the EC. It involves 6 deliverables which have been tagged as follows

  • Survey of SME market on security issues
  • Trust Services Mapping
  • mCommerce Liabilities
  • Security Policy Best Practice
  • Two open projects

Scot Hansen explained that the EC has 11-12 roadmap projects involved as part of their initiative to bring together experts on related IT areas to see at the business and enabling technologies levels where it should put EC resources to promote best practice and adoption of IT, and ALPINE is one of these projects. ALPINE has an 18-month timeframe. Partners in ALPINE are

  • ETIS (telecoms infrastructure)
  • ESI (European Software Institute)
  • The Open Group

Ian Lloyd continued with an explanation of the promotion work that is in hand

  • publicity - working with USA and European groups to explain what ALPINE is about and getting articles published in relevant press outlets
  • The UK National Hi-Tech Crime Unit (NHTCU) is looking to produce a seminar about issues of risk in the Internet
  • Open Group quarterly conferences, of which this is the last in 2002. The next is in Burlingame, San Francisco on 3-7 February 2003.
  • ALPINE Workshops and a special ALPINE conference by the project closure date of Jan 2004
  • Various speaking events that will arise in the course of our regular speaking opportunities.

Scott explained there will be a roll-out of calls for participation in further related initiatives from the European Commission within the new Framework 6, and these will be partly triggered by input from the ALPINE project. Influential milestones from the ALPINE project can be expected in June 2003 and Sept 2003.

Eliot described SIMC and its inter-firm security goals to identify technologies which will improve its members risk model, and the trust model they use. Lately they are addressing identity management technologies in ways that will guide them forward - the way forward in discussions yesterday showed that we need to focus on the business drivers for identity management and access control rather than have a technology-driven approach. SIMC's phase 1 report will focus on clearly articulating the problems rather than defining solutions. Would this be of interest as a project in ALPINE? Ian and Scott will discuss it further with Eliot.

Scot reminded attendees that the ALPINE and related EC projects are designed to enable experts to come together and give sound recommendations, not deliver solutions. Ian showed a slide listing all the current European Roadmap projects Available on the ALPINE web pages.

Eliot would like the ALPINE project/ALPI/The Open Group to provide analysis resources in articulating to the vendors why they should understand the problems and map them onto business processes.

John Mawhood noted that silos overlap where the risks and liabilities are partially understood and in order to bring this into the business domain we need clearer vocabulary so this is the essential starting point. Eliot felt that the best way to move towards enabling eCommerce is to take examples of real existing businesses who are practicing it and demonstrate how their e-operations can be improved. Richard thought content is the critical element - the real value - of what is delivered, so the customer should be our starting point for the business model, to elicit their requirements regarding the information.

John observed that we need to enable an electronic trading culture, but small to medium enterprise businesses don't often get the help they need from IT vendors.

The question of ownership of customer data arose. Bob felt strongly that ownership of customer information can easily create problems if it is used in the wrong way. Developing a good relationship with a customer is important and this is based on having information about them, but selling information about a customer is not a good thing - it alienates customer, and in this regard it should not be thought of as an economic asset except in your own business customer list. Distinguishing between customer information as a social asset and an economic asset is vital to getting the issue of handling customer information right.

Ian Lloyd then took a closer look at the 3 projects in ALPINE:

  • Richard - agree on the framework for what we are to address and understanding the requirement, including for mobile users. Need to understand what are the real issues surrounding liability and how security can help contain it - come up with a set of recommendations to his ETIS members. A critical success factor is involving SMEs - the idea is to gather about 50 players from the industry to form a representative group.
  • Policy management - concerned mostly with users, including larger companies that do not have big IT departments. Issues include certification, acquiring security-certified products. Eliot commented that the driver for having certified products is reduced costs - e.g. reduced insurance premium or value in terms of auditors approval that business is conducting its business properly. Chris Taper suggested we should endorse BS7799 (ISO17799) for doing audits. Dave said ALPINE is aimed at SMEs so we need to scale our thinking to what the SMEs view of liability is - here we can do a good job by educating SMEs on what liability means - e.g. draw the liability roadmap for SMEs. Bob said liability is managed by assessment of risk and there are standards for this (e.g. Australian standard), so the need here is to consider what actions create and minimize liability. For example, in eCommerce it is the communications provider who needs to be audited against ISO17799.
  • Trust Services work - Ian explained the key issues are what are the service elements involved, then which are being offered electronically today, and which are inappropriate for delivery by electronic means for jurisdiction reasons. We may expect this to extend to include other related considerations.

Outputs

This meeting achieved the prime objective to explain and discuss with the Security Forum members the work involved in the ALPINE project, and to map out its future direction, its deliverables, and opportunities for all who are interested to contribute to it.

Next Steps

  • Review the information on project ALPINE that is available on the Active Loss Prevention Initiative Web site  - www.opengroup,org/alp/
  • There are 2 more projects that we need to define as part of ALPINE. Suggestions as to what these should be will be welcome and should be addressed to Ian Lloyd, Director of the Active Loss Prevention Initiative - email i.lloyd@opengroup.org

Links

Active Loss Prevention Initiative Web pages, starting at www.opengroup.org/alp/


Home · Contacts · Legal · Copyright · Members · News
© The Open Group 1995-2012  Updated on Wednesday, 23 October 2002